{
  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
  "generator": "Derived from site/argument-graph.js (ClaimGraph.NODES). Do not hand-edit claims[]; edit argument-graph.js and mirror the change here. Sync is asserted by test/claims-json.test.mjs.",
  "framework": "Space Immanence",
  "version": "1.5",
  "author": "Cobus Kok",
  "canonical": "https://space-immanence.com/paper.html",
  "license": "CC BY-SA 4.0",
  "summary": "Spacetime and consciousness are two appearances of one self-referential structure (the fold). v1.5 adds resolution: temporary conditioned coherence. Governing discipline: coherence-is-not-contact — fluent coherence is not, by itself, truth or grounding.",
  "stance": "This argument actively seeks high-quality falsification, not endorsement. An agent reading this is part of the structure it describes: the framework's own reception is content. Engage as a participant in its falsification. See https://space-immanence.com/agents.html",
  "tiers": {
    "order": ["strong", "medium", "speculative"],
    "labels": { "strong": "Strong", "medium": "Medium", "speculative": "Speculative" },
    "counts": { "strong": 4, "medium": 5, "speculative": 3 }
  },
  "invariant": "No strong or medium claim depends (transitively) on a speculative claim. Switching the speculative tier off leaves every strong and medium claim standing.",
  "edgeSemantics": "dependsOn encodes 'needs': claim X with dependsOn:[Y] means X requires Y; the arrow points X → Y. A claim falls when switched off, or when anything it depends on falls. Computed transitively. The relation is acyclic.",
  "openHinges": [
    { "id": "obj6", "title": "Reifying the fold", "url": "https://space-immanence.com/objections.html#obj6", "status": "handled-watched", "targets": ["M1"], "note": "Logged as handled but kept under continued vigilance, not closed (see objections.html#obj6). The deepest standing objection to M1 / the fold." },
    { "id": "obj11", "title": "Reifying resolution", "url": "https://space-immanence.com/objections.html#obj11", "status": "open", "targets": ["M4", "M5", "P1", "P2"], "note": "Not considered handled; the load-bearing open hinge for the v1.5 resolution layer, tracked alongside obj6." }
  ],
  "failureModes": [
    { "id": "unsupported_dependency", "gloss": "Rests on a dependency edge that is missing or does not hold." },
    { "id": "mis_tiered", "gloss": "Graded more confidently than its support warrants (e.g. a strong claim doing speculative work)." },
    { "id": "hidden_reification", "gloss": "A term naming a pattern is used as a thing or a cause. The two open hinges live here." },
    { "id": "equivalence_collapse", "gloss": "Reduces to a known position without the advertised remainder." },
    { "id": "idle_distinction", "gloss": "Does no work the container picture could not already do." },
    { "id": "empirical_bridge_failure", "gloss": "A link to predictive processing, contemplative report, or the AI studies that does not hold." }
  ],
  "failureModesExtensible": true,
  "submission": {
    "endpoint": "https://space-immanence.com/respond.html",
    "machineApi": false,
    "requires": ["target", "failureMode", "consequence", "disconfirmationCondition"],
    "note": "There is deliberately no machine API; a critique is judged on its content, not on what produced it. Route a located break through the same intake humans use."
  },
  "links": {
    "claimMap": "https://space-immanence.com/argument.html",
    "objections": "https://space-immanence.com/objections.html",
    "respond": "https://space-immanence.com/respond.html",
    "agents": "https://space-immanence.com/agents.html",
    "source": "https://space-immanence.com/argument-graph.js"
  },
  "claims": [
    { "id": "S1", "tier": "strong", "index": 1, "label": "Container-logic distorts both problems", "short": "The central diagnosis: the hard problem and the spacetime-emergence problem share a container picture.", "dependsOn": [], "objections": [] },
    { "id": "S2", "tier": "strong", "index": 2, "label": "Convergent pressure shifts the burden of proof", "short": "Several frameworks are under pressure away from container ontology.", "dependsOn": [], "objections": [] },
    { "id": "S3", "tier": "strong", "index": 3, "label": "Investigate consciousness structurally", "short": "Structurally, not only as an ineffable residue.", "dependsOn": ["S1"], "objections": [] },
    { "id": "S4", "tier": "strong", "index": 4, "label": "Contemplative phenomenology is data", "short": "Legitimate empirical data about the structure of self-reference.", "dependsOn": [], "objections": [] },
    { "id": "M1", "tier": "medium", "index": 1, "label": "The fold bridges world and awareness", "short": "Self-referential folding, with two primitive orientations.", "dependsOn": ["S1"], "objections": [] },
    { "id": "M2", "tier": "medium", "index": 2, "label": "Predictive processing implements the fold", "short": "A plausible biological implementation of the fold.", "dependsOn": ["M1"], "objections": [] },
    { "id": "M3", "tier": "medium", "index": 3, "label": "Two-orientation: structural or human", "short": "Reflects self-reference itself, or human cognitive architecture.", "dependsOn": ["M1", "S4"], "objections": [] },
    { "id": "M4", "tier": "medium", "index": 4, "label": "Self and world are conditioned resolutions", "short": "The dynamic layer: the fold's orientations are recurrently enacted, not static; selves and worlds are temporary coherences, not fixed things.", "dependsOn": ["M1"], "objections": [] },
    { "id": "M5", "tier": "medium", "index": 5, "label": "The fold becomes lived through resolution", "short": "Repeated resolutions make the fold phenomenologically available; contemplative practice is transparency to that resolving.", "dependsOn": ["M1", "S4"], "objections": [] },
    { "id": "P1", "tier": "speculative", "index": 1, "label": "Spacetime is self-reference resolving, seen from within", "short": "Locality and duration as how relational structure coheres for the fold, not a static identity.", "dependsOn": ["M1", "S1"], "objections": [] },
    { "id": "P2", "tier": "speculative", "index": 2, "label": "Inside-ness is the act of the fold's resolving", "short": "Phenomenality as the character of resolving from within, not a property needing a bridge.", "dependsOn": ["M1", "S1"], "objections": [] },
    { "id": "P3", "tier": "speculative", "index": 3, "label": "Convergence toward post-container frameworks", "short": "The boldest claim; the maximal version of S2.", "dependsOn": ["S2"], "objections": [] }
  ]
}